starred/OpenEPaperLink
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink.git synced 2026-03-21 00:04:28 +01:00
Code Issues 472 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #389] AP list doesn't show correct fw version #3549

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-03-20 23:06:36 +01:00 by sascha_hemi · 3 comments
sascha_hemi commented 2026-03-20 23:06:36 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Calimerorulez on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/issues/389

Originally assigned to: @nlimper on GitHub.

Just a cosmetic bug I think. I just updated to 2.70, and now the update page shows:

Your version is newer than the latest release date.
Are you the developer? :-)

env:                ESP32_S3_16_8_YELLOW_AP
build date:         2024-11-03 20:31
esp32 version:      2.7
filesystem version: 2.70 <- not matching!
psram size:         8383831
flash size:         16777216
--------------------------

Same on a v3 AP.

Originally created by @Calimerorulez on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/issues/389 Originally assigned to: @nlimper on GitHub. Just a cosmetic bug I think. I just updated to 2.70, and now the update page shows: ``` Your version is newer than the latest release date. Are you the developer? :-) ``` ``` env: ESP32_S3_16_8_YELLOW_AP build date: 2024-11-03 20:31 esp32 version: 2.7 filesystem version: 2.70 <- not matching! psram size: 8383831 flash size: 16777216 -------------------------- ``` Same on a v3 AP.
sascha_hemi added the bug label 2026-03-20 23:06:36 +01:00
sascha_hemi commented 2026-03-20 23:06:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Calimerorulez commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

Addition:

I've got 4 APs, 2 are updated to 2.7, but the Active access point page shows all APs are at 2.7.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2457470157 --> @Calimerorulez commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): Addition: I've got 4 APs, 2 are updated to 2.7, but the Active access point page shows all APs are at 2.7.
sascha_hemi commented 2026-03-20 23:06:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nlimper commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

your first point: just cosmetic, the 2.70 is treated as numeric somewhere and displayed as 2.7
Already fixed in 7805ab2b46

But I leave this open for your addition. I will look in to it.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2458144711 --> @nlimper commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): your first point: just cosmetic, the 2.70 is treated as numeric somewhere and displayed as 2.7 Already fixed in https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/commit/7805ab2b467f71bb94e1aed650b48e7847f62294 But I leave this open for your addition. I will look in to it.
sascha_hemi commented 2026-03-20 23:06:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nlimper commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2024):

Fixed in a6772c6fae
It was a frontend problem. To fix, replace /www/main.js.gz with the updated file (and make sure it's refreshed from the cache in your browser).

<!-- gh-comment-id:2464328586 --> @nlimper commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2024): Fixed in https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/commit/a6772c6fae3a4561c6f350246bf9f52600a52345 It was a frontend problem. To fix, replace `/www/main.js.gz` with the updated file (and make sure it's refreshed from the cache in your browser).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
88MZ100 FW
ARM Tag FW
ap fw
bug
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
nRF FW
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
tag fw
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
sascha_hemi
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/OpenEPaperLink#3549
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?