[GH-ISSUE #328] update tag type definitions- error on readme.md #742

New Issue

sascha_hemi · 2026-03-20T18:12:29+01:00

sascha_hemi commented

2026-03-20 18:12:29 +01:00

Originally created by @rvdv01 on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/issues/328

Describe the bug
Using 2.60b, when clicking’update tag type definitions’, an error is thrown

To Reproduce
Go to update
Click ‘update tag type definitions’

Expected behavior
The update runs normally

Screenshots

Originally created by @rvdv01 on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/issues/328 **Describe the bug** Using 2.60b, when clicking’update tag type definitions’, an error is thrown **To Reproduce** Go to update Click ‘update tag type definitions’ **Expected behavior** The update runs normally **Screenshots** ![IMG_0126](https://github.com/OpenEPaperLink/OpenEPaperLink/assets/16882848/004c6226-707a-4aa4-8e84-70682fea84d1)

sascha_hemi added the bug label 2026-03-20 18:12:29 +01:00

sascha_hemi closed this issue

2026-03-20 18:12:29 +01:00

sascha_hemi commented

2026-03-20 18:12:29 +01:00

@nlimper commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024):

You can ignore the error. It would be better to skip readme.MD but it doesn’t do any harm.

@nlimper commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024): You can ignore the error. It would be better to skip readme.MD but it doesn’t do any harm.

sascha_hemi commented

2026-03-20 18:12:30 +01:00

@rvdv01 commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024):

You can ignore the error. It would be better to skip readme.MD but it doesn’t do any harm.

Ignoring things is what I do best :-)

Since the error message was the last line, I was unsure if it crashed after encountering readme.md or if there were simply no files on the server that started with an ‘s’.
Also, when I retried the download, the system again said ‘updating version 0 to 1’ for every definition file, so it seemed to me some process perhaps hadn’t finished properly (eg. a process that notes the version of all definition files in some kind of database).

Thanks for the quick reply.

@rvdv01 commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024): > You can ignore the error. It would be better to skip readme.MD but it doesn’t do any harm. Ignoring things is what I do best :-) Since the error message was the last line, I was unsure if it crashed after encountering readme.md or if there were simply no files on the server that started with an ‘s’. Also, when I retried the download, the system again said ‘updating version 0 to 1’ for every definition file, so it seemed to me some process perhaps hadn’t finished properly (eg. a process that notes the version of all definition files in some kind of database). Thanks for the quick reply.

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/OpenEPaperLink#742